It’s a good thing we have a new Collective Bargaining
Agreement in the NHL, even though we sacrificed half of a season to get there.
The aftermath of the 2004-05 lockout birthed those laughable long-term deals
that dove into salary-minimum territory towards the tail end of the deals when
the player who signed probably wasn’t expected to actually be playing anymore. Free
Agency makes General Managers go crazy I guess.
To retroactively punish the teams that dabbled in this kind of
creative accounting, the new CBA has built into it a “cap-recapture” clause
which basically charges a team in future salary cap space the difference
between actual salary paid and annual cap hit, or cap benefit, should a player
retire before the end of their deal. The
result as we are starting to see is that teams are buying out otherwise
serviceable players who are signed to these sorts of deals and allowing them to
hit the market to sign more CBA-compliant deals.
But this doesn’t mean all sanity has returned to the NHL.
Sure, some GMs make some questionable moves but no other GM has provided me
with more WTSF moments then Paul Holmgren of the Philadelphia Flyers.
Let’s go back a couple years to really take a look at what
this man has done. In the 2007-08 season, Holmgren signed Mike Richards to a
12-year, $69-million contract extension that took effect at the beginning of
the following season when he would also assume team captaincy. In late 2010,
Holmgren signed Jeff Carter to an 11-year, $58-million extension to take effect
for the 2011-12 season with all the no trade/no movement bells and whistles.
And to solve the Flyers’ goaltending woes that had plagued recent playoff
performances, in the summer of 2011 Holmgren signed Ilya Bryzgalov to a 9-year,
$51-million contract. And guess what? None of these men play for the Flyers
anymore!
Now I know that GMs can pretty much do as they please as far
as their assets go as long as it falls within the scope of the CBA but
something has to be said when one in particular is building a reputation of
signing players long term just to give them away shortly after the fact. It's
one thing to part ways with a player entering the final years of a long deal
who may not be as effective as at the start, but it's a real head-scratcher to
see this occur more often than once in the infant stages of a contract. I
honestly wouldn’t trust this guy with a handshake or my wallet.
When you sign a long-term deal to play for a team, you do it
because you feel comfortable playing in the same sweater for an extended period
of time and you want the security that comes along with it. I understand that
down the road the player might not be the right fit for the team but Holmgren
didn’t actually take the time to allow these relationships to mature before he
got bored with his toys. During the offseason in 2011, Richards was traded to
the Los Angeles Kings. In the same week Carter was traded to the Columbus Blue
Jackets, before his contract extension took effect. And Bryzgalov was bought
out on Wednesday of last week with only two seasons, one of which was shortened
by way of lockout, as a Flyer.
And just to put the cherry on top, Holmgren came out to the
media to state that it was a business decision due to the salary cap which is
why Bryz’s $5.66 annual average salary comes off the books. But a week before,
word came out that newly acquired defenseman Mark Streit would be signing a
4-year contract worth $21-million, averaging $5.25-million per year. This is
the point I completely lost my sense of what reality is. To restate what just
happened, buying out one contract to replace it with another that is a couple
hundred thousand dollars less is purely a decision based on shrewd,
business-minded logic. Cut the crap, Holmgren.
Of course there is some back-story here which, in a vacuum,
makes this buyout perfectly reasonable. Bryzgalov came over to the Flyers from
the small market Phoenix Coyotes as a Free Agent. Towards the end of his days
there, he put up some pretty stellar numbers which were bolstered by Phoenix’s effective
defensive style. Philadelphia, by comparison, is an untamed animal where
everything from his play to his personality was put in the spotlight and
scrutinized by the media, a much different beast than Phoenix where the ongoing
ownership issue takes front and center. Bryzgalov had trouble not only repeating
his past performance when back-stopping a more run-and-gun club but also justifying
the big payday he received to play in a Flyers uniform.
But pull this situation back into the scope of the real
world and you start to wonder if Paul Holmgren has a plan for the future of
this team or if he is just shooting contracts like shotgun shells and hopes
something sticks to the target. I will agree that by signing Mark Streit the
Flyers addressed a need, defense, but it was at the expense of a goaltender
that they had committed, at least on paper, a lot of time and money to. And the
buyout came at the heels of a shortened season that netted subpar results from
Philadelphia. With the new CBA in effect, all teams have through this next
season which will feature full training camp and preseason to decide how to use
two compliance buyouts. Just like I said about the possibility of Dan Bylsma
losing his job, I don’t think the 2013 NHL Season is a reasonable sample size
to judge a person who didn’t meet expectations but otherwise has a respectable
resume.
It just seems like this franchise isn't looking to correct a
problem but just creates more for itself. At present, the solution appears to
be hand the goaltending reigns to Steve Mason, a young goaltender who won a
Calder Trophy in a Blue Jackets sweater before going through play-affecting
confidence issues. The beginning of free agency should see Holmgren bring in
someone to split time with Mason, but what if the Flyers miss the playoffs by a
sizeable margin for a second season in a row?
This team has missed the playoffs twice since the 1994-95
season so I don't understand why they keep hitting the panic button on big name
players. Often with teams in "win now" mode depth guys get shuffled
around and swapped out but the core group will remain mostly intact. Although
Bryzgalov didn't establish himself as a core guy, you would think that when you
throw a large amount of money at one player, you would invest in a couple role
players to compliment your star's style. Sadly I would argue that Philadelphia
did little to nothing to bolster their blue line after the departure of Chris
Pronger in 2011. They did acquire Luke Schenn, a 23 year-old, 5-year NHL
veteran with plenty of room to grow, and finally adding some veteran support in
Streit only after Bryz knew he would be gone. You can only ask a goaltender to
steal so many games for you when you don't replenish any support on defense.
If I were Ed Snider, owner of the Flyers, Holmgren would be
on a very short leash. With the compliance buyout, Bryzgalov still makes a hair
over $1.6-million from Philadelphia through the next 14 years. That is money
that won't count against the salary cap but it's a check to cut each year for a
player that is competing in another jersey. Comparing this situation to the
fiasco in Vancouver between Roberto Luongo and Cory Schneider over the past two
seasons, I would say Philadelphia is further up s--- creek than the Canucks. With
Schneider being traded to the New Jersey Devils, at least the Canucks decided
to sleep in the bed it made for itself with Luongo's contract lasting through
the 2021-22 season. The Canucks can now look to the future and forward from their goal crease while Philadelphia
will constantly, literally, look over their shoulder.
No comments:
Post a Comment